Linear Collider Forum



Home » Analysis and Reconstruction » Tracking & Vertexing » PulseFinder
Re: PulseFinder [message #521 is a reply to message #520] Mon, 19 June 2006 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
killenberg
Messages: 125
Registered: July 2005
Location: CERN
So one will need a processor which brings the TDC data into the "default" reconstruction chain, and the collection name indicates that there is something special about the collection and it does not follow the conventions (as you proposed using the special name "TPCRawPulses"). But I still think this should happen as early as possible to avoid double code. ChannelByChannelCorrector and PedestalSubstractor run on TrackerPulses. They have to be reimplemented for the TDC if you use TrackerPulses.

How about "TDCData"? To be correct the raw data collection then should be named "FADCRawData". And both end up in the (electronics calibrated) "TPCData".

Greetings

Martin

(btw. Does the TDC need pedestal correction at all?

[Updated on: Mon, 19 June 2006 09:25]


Martin Killenberg

CERN
martin.killenberg@cern.ch
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic:TPCCondData: TPCConditions and ChannelCorrection
Next Topic:MarlinTPC on ilcsoft web site
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Dec 13 14:00:24 Pacific Standard Time 2018
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.1.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software